Finance entity

Mark Hamrick

Person

economy is the sole category represented across all 2 tracked stories. Federal Reserve is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 2 of the 2 tracked stories. The 57-day window averages about 0.2 stories each week. The 5.5 average consequence score is below the beat benchmark of 6.3 in the same window.

Last mentioned: Aug 7, 2026

Entity pulse

Recent coverage · Mark Hamrick

2 stories
5.5 avg impact
0% positive
50% negative

Coverage balance Negative coverage leads. Negative coverage exceeds positive coverage by 50 percentage points.

  • 50% neutral
  • 50% negative

Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.

What the coverage shows about Mark Hamrick

economy is the sole category represented across all 2 tracked stories. Federal Reserve is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 2 of the 2 tracked stories. The 57-day window averages about 0.2 stories each week. The 5.5 average consequence score is below the beat benchmark of 6.3 in the same window. Source depth averages 2.5 original sources per story, versus 3.1 across the same-window beat baseline. This profile follows 2 Finance stories mentioning Mark Hamrick across the period from June 12, 2026 to August 7, 2026.

Stories tracked
2
Per week
0.2
Sources per story
2.5

Computed from the 2 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 980 Finance stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.

Coverage cohort

Appears alongside

Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering Mark Hamrick. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.

Stories mentioning Mark Hamrick 2

Mark Hamrick is linked from 2 stories on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.

See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source link? Report a data issue.