Markets Neutral 5

2 Space Stocks Could Join Nasdaq-100 After SpaceX's $2T IPO

Index inclusion is a liquidity event. The Motley Fool lists AST SpaceMobile and Intuitive Machines as potential Nasdaq-100 additions by 2030 after SpaceX reported a $2 trillion debut. For investors, the debate is whether current valuations can expand fast enough to meet index thresholds and attract passive flows.

· 4 min read ·

Beat this week

Last 7 days · Markets

42 stories
5.9 avg impact
29% positive
7% negative
vs prior 7 days -11 -11 stories vs prior 7 days

Impact 5.9/10 (-0.1 vs prior). Counts are stories in our record, not a market forecast.

Open the change report

Coverage balance Positive coverage leads. Positive coverage exceeds negative coverage by 22 percentage points.

  • 29% positive
  • 64% neutral
  • 7% negative

This story sits in Markets — the counts compare this beat's last 7 days with the previous 7 in our verified record, not a market forecast.

Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record (as of ) The volume change compares this window with the prior 7 days in the same record. — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.

Finance briefing

Key takeaways

5 impact
Neutralsentiment
4min read
  1. Index inclusion is a liquidity event.
  2. The Motley Fool lists AST SpaceMobile and Intuitive Machines as potential Nasdaq-100 additions by 2030 after SpaceX reported a $2 trillion debut.
  3. For investors, the debate is whether current valuations can expand fast enough to meet index thresholds and attract passive flows.

In this briefing

Mentioned

Key Intelligence

Key Facts

  1. 1The Motley Fool article predicts AST SpaceMobile and Intuitive Machines are potential Nasdaq-100 entrants by 2030, joining SpaceX and Rocket Lab.
  2. 2SpaceX is reported to have completed the largest IPO in history and reached a $2 trillion market cap.
  3. 3Nasdaq added SpaceX to the Nasdaq-100 immediately after its debut; Rocket Lab was also recently added.
  4. 4AST SpaceMobile is developing large satellite arrays designed to beam high-speed internet directly to mobile phones, without a ground antenna, unlike Starlink's current service.
  5. 5AST SpaceMobile management has formed multiple partnerships with telecom companies worldwide to resell or upsell its direct-to-device connectivity.
  6. 6The central uncertainty is whether AST SpaceMobile's satellite technology works at scale and when widespread coverage can be achieved.
Space Economy Market Outlook

Analysis

For market participants, Nasdaq-100 membership isn't a trophy—it's a structural buyer. The index has driven persistent passive inflows for recent entrants like SpaceX and Rocket Lab. The open question for AST SpaceMobile and Intuitive Machines is whether their fundamentals, share prices, and liquidity can scale sufficiently by 2030 to satisfy Nasdaq's non-financial size and volume requirements.

What to Watch

The cluster centers on a forward-looking Motley Fool piece published on October 2, 2026, which argues that two space stocks—AST SpaceMobile (NASDAQ: ASTS) and Intuitive Machines—could join SpaceX and Rocket Lab in the Nasdaq-100 index by 2030. The thesis is built around the rapid normalization of space as a mainstream equity sector. According to the article, SpaceX debuted on public markets with the largest initial public offering in history and now carries a market capitalization of $2 trillion. Nasdaq added SpaceX to the Nasdaq-100 promptly, and Rocket Lab was also recently added. The Nasdaq-100 is composed of the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq, making membership a meaningful threshold for institutional and passive investors. This is a prediction piece, not a report of confirmed events. The publication is part of an investor-education and stock-picking genre that mixes analysis with promotional language. The article itself refers to 'prediction' and promotional signals. Therefore, the $2 trillion SpaceX valuation and IPO status should be treated as reported figures from the piece, not independently verified financial results. AST SpaceMobile's candidacy is the most detailed. The company is developing large satellite arrays intended to beam high-speed internet directly to mobile devices. That distinguishes it from SpaceX's Starlink service, which currently requires a dedicated antenna. If it achieves widespread coverage, the direct-to-device constellation could unlock a multi-billion-dollar revenue opportunity. The company has already formed partnerships with telecommunications operators around the world that plan to upsell the service to existing customers. The core uncertainty is technological and commercial execution—whether the satellites work as designed and when coverage reaches scale. Intuitive Machines is the second candidate named in the article, though the available source excerpts provide less detail on its specific path to Nasdaq-100 eligibility. Its inclusion alongside SpaceX and Rocket Lab suggests the authors view lunar infrastructure and related space services as another avenue for explosive market-cap growth. But absent additional data in the sources, this part of the thesis rests on the company's sector positioning rather than quantified milestones. From a market-structure perspective, Nasdaq-100 inclusion has concrete consequences. Passive funds tracking the index would likely need to buy shares, which can reduce float and amplify upside. SpaceX's immediate addition—if accurate—demonstrates that Nasdaq is willing to incorporate very large space companies quickly. Rocket Lab's recent addition shows the bar may be lowering for smaller but fast-growing space pure plays. That dynamic is important for ASTS and Intuitive Machines investors because index inclusion can re-rate a stock beyond its fundamentals, especially in a thematic sector with limited public assets. However, the distance between current market values and Nasdaq-100 entry is substantial. The article does not provide AST SpaceMobile's or Intuitive Machines' current market capitalizations, revenue, or liquidity. The Nasdaq-100 is market-cap weighted and requires high trading volume; a company probably needs to be among the 100 largest non-financial Nasdaq listings, which historically means tens of billions of dollars at minimum, and that threshold may be much higher by 2030. Both companies would need not only successful execution but also sustained investor demand to bridge the gap. The prediction is thus an optimistic scenario, not a base case. The broader space economy is in a transition from government-led programs to commercial services. Direct-to-device satellite internet is one of its most contested fronts, with AST SpaceMobile competing against SpaceX, Globalstar, and other entrants. The regulatory environment for spectrum and orbital rights remains a wildcard, especially as constellations proliferate. Investors in this niche must weigh capital intensity, launch costs, and the risk of technological delays. By 2030, the Nasdaq-100 could look very different. If AST SpaceMobile delivers a working direct-to-phone network with global telecommunication distribution, its market cap could scale significantly. If Intuitive Machines capitalizes on lunar and deep-space commercial contracts, it could also grow. But index membership is an outcome, not a strategy. The next five years will be defined by execution milestones: successful satellite deployments, commercial agreements that convert to paid subscribers, and progress toward positive cash flow. Investors should monitor those indicators rather than treating the prediction as a predetermined path. The article provides a useful framework for the space economy's expanding public-market footprint, but the leap from 'potential Nasdaq-100 candidate' to actual inclusion remains wide.

Cite This Page

"2 Space Stocks Could Join Nasdaq-100 After SpaceX's $2T IPO." Finance Intelligence Brief, October 3, 2026. https://getfinancebrief.com/story/nasdaq-100-inclusion-space-stocks-asts-lunr-2030

How we covered this story

Every story in our finance coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.

Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the finance space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.

Sources are only linked to a story once they clear our classification pipeline at a minimum 35 percent relevance threshold. According to that methodology, reviewed July 2026, this follows multi-source corroboration standards recommended by journalism research bodies such as the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

See something wrong in this story — a wrong fact, a broken source link, a misattributed entity? Report a data issue.