Earnings Neutral 5

Mako Mining Q2: $31.7M Adjusted EBITDA, $0.16 EPS, Record Gold Sales

Mako Mining posted Q2 2026 adjusted EBITDA of $31.7 million and EPS of $0.16 on record revenue of $62.6 million, driven by realized gold prices of $4,201 per ounce against AISC of $2,286. The company says its $112 million cash position can fund remaining development without external capital and hints at upcoming shareholder capital returns.

· 5 min read · Verified by 2 sources ·

Finance briefing

Key takeaways

5 impact
Neutralsentiment
2sources
5min read
  1. Mako Mining posted Q2 2026 adjusted EBITDA of $31.7 million and EPS of $0.16 on record revenue of $62.6 million, driven by realized gold prices of $4,201 per ounce against AISC of $2,286.
  2. The company says its $112 million cash position can fund remaining development without external capital and hints at upcoming shareholder capital returns.
Drawn from
  • newjerseytelegraph.com
  • finanznachrichten.de

In this briefing

Mentioned

Key Intelligence

Key Facts

  1. 1Mako Mining reported record company-reported Q2 2026 revenue of $62.6 million, with net income of $13.9 million, or $0.16 per share.
  2. 2Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $31.7 million and mine operating cash flow was $25.9 million, according to the company.
  3. 3The company sold 14,610 ounces of gold at an average realized price of $4,201 per ounce, with AISC of $2,286 per ounce sold.
  4. 4Mako reported a cash and gold-linked securities balance of approximately $112 million as of the release.
  5. 5Return on equity was reported at 36.6% and return on assets at 23.8% for the underlying assets.
  6. 6Exploration and evaluation expenses totaled $2.9 million, split across San Albino, Eagle Mountain, and Mt. Hamilton.
Adjusted EBITDA
$31.7M Record quarter

Mako Mining Q2 2026, on revenue of $62.6 million and net income of $13.9 million

We currently have a cash and gold-linked securities balance of approximately $112 million, which along with operating cash flow from our two mines, is more than sufficient to fully fund our two remaining development projects without the need for any external capital.

Akiba Leisman CEO, Mako Mining Corp.

Q2 2026 financial results press release

Analysis

For investors in junior gold producers, the key question is always whether earnings can fund growth without dilution. Mako's Q2 numbers suggest exactly that: a $31.7 million adjusted EBITDA print, a 50.6% EBITDA margin, and a $112 million cash and gold-linked securities balance that management says covers both remaining development projects. The real catalyst may be the company's stated plan to unveil a capital-return or cost-of-capital strategy in the coming weeks.

Mako Mining Corp. reported its Q2 2026 financial results on August 14, 2026, via ACCESS Newswire, describing what it characterizes as record revenue of $62.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026. Because both source articles are identical newswire distributions of the company's own press release, the figures should be treated as company-reported and unaudited claims rather than independently verified data. Even with that caveat, the results stand out for a junior gold producer: Mako says it generated $31.7 million in adjusted EBITDA, $25.9 million in mine operating cash flow, and $13.9 million in net income, equating to $0.16 per share. The company sold 14,610 ounces of gold at an average realized price of $4,201 per ounce, with an all-in sustaining cost of $2,286 per ounce sold. That spread implies a gross margin of roughly $1,915 per ounce before considering the specific non-GAAP adjustments Mako uses, and it explains the strong earnings in a quarter when gold prices were elevated.

Even with that caveat, the results stand out for a junior gold producer: Mako says it generated $31.7 million in adjusted EBITDA, $25.9 million in mine operating cash flow, and $13.9 million in net income, equating to $0.16 per share.

The results carry broader context for the gold mining sector. At a realized price above $4,200 per ounce, producers that can keep AISC below $3,000 are capturing unusually wide margins. Mako's reported AISC of $2,286 per ounce is not the lowest in the industry, but it is well below the realized price, allowing the company to convert revenue into operating cash flow at a high rate. The $31.7 million adjusted EBITDA figure implies an EBITDA margin of approximately 50.6% relative to the $62.6 million revenue figure, which is substantial even by the standards of a high-margin gold price environment. The company's reported return on equity of 36.6% and return on assets of 23.8% are also notable; if accurate, they suggest capital is being deployed efficiently across the two producing mines. Mako's management is already highlighting these metrics as evidence that its underlying assets can generate shareholder value without the dilution that often accompanies development-stage mining companies.

A major theme in the release is the balance sheet. CEO Akiba Leisman states that Mako has a cash and gold-linked securities balance of approximately $112 million, which the company says is sufficient to fully fund its two remaining development projects, Eagle Mountain in Guyana and Mt. Hamilton, without raising external capital. That claim matters because junior miners frequently require equity raises to build projects, diluting existing shareholders. If Mako can self-fund development from operating cash flow and its existing cash balance, it would differentiate itself from peers and justify a lower cost of capital over time. The CEO explicitly says the company plans to unveil plans for lowering its cost of capital in the ensuing weeks, possibly including a pathway for substantial shareholder capital returns. This forward-looking language is promotional, and the press release provides no specifics on whether such returns would take the form of dividends, buybacks, or other mechanisms. Investors should treat the capital return discussion as an intention, not a commitment.

What to Watch

Exploration spending of $2.9 million during the quarter offers additional operational insight. The company allocated $1.4 million to areas surrounding San Albino, $1.4 million to Eagle Mountain in Guyana, and $0.1 million to Mt. Hamilton. This relatively modest exploration budget suggests that Mako is focused more on extending existing assets and advancing known development projects than on high-risk greenfield exploration. For a company emphasizing efficient capital utilization, that allocation is consistent with a strategy of maximizing near-term cash generation rather than chasing early-stage discovery. The split between San Albino and Eagle Mountain also indicates the company is balancing investment across its Nicaraguan and Guyanese assets, though geographic and permitting risks in those jurisdictions are not addressed in the release.

For market participants, the immediate question is whether these results can be sustained. Gold prices in mid-2026 have clearly supported strong realized pricing, but AISC of $2,286 per ounce leaves less cushion than some lower-cost producers enjoy if gold prices retreat. The company's ability to maintain production at two mines while funding two development projects without external capital will depend on continued operating discipline. The coming disclosure on capital allocation could serve as a catalyst for the stock, but until the company provides concrete details, the announcement is best viewed as a strong operational quarter accompanied by an ambitious but unverified promise of shareholder returns. The NASDAQ and TSXV listings, with tickers MAKO and MKO respectively, mean the results will be measured against U.S. and Canadian market expectations, and analysts will likely seek the full unaudited financial statements and management discussion on SEDAR+ before drawing firmer conclusions.

Source cluster

Primary reporting

2articles

Cite This Page

"Mako Mining Q2: $31.7M Adjusted EBITDA, $0.16 EPS, Record Gold Sales." Finance Intelligence Brief, August 14, 2026. https://getfinancebrief.com/story/mako-mining-q2-2026-adjusted-ebitda-317m-eps-016

How we covered this story

Every story in our finance coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.

Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the finance space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.

Sources are only linked to a story once they clear our classification pipeline at a minimum 35 percent relevance threshold. According to that methodology, reviewed July 2026, this follows multi-source corroboration standards recommended by journalism research bodies such as the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

See something wrong in this story — a wrong fact, a broken source link, a misattributed entity? Report a data issue.