Indian Banks Poised for 17% Core PPoP Rebound by FY29: Goldman

After three fiscal years of earnings downgrades that compressed private-bank core PPoP growth to 9% and state-owned bank growth to 5%, Goldman Sachs now sees a 17% rebound through FY29E. With private bank valuations below COVID-era levels and RBI liquidity improving, this is a potential re-rating window for financials investors — but the call hinges on margin recovery and asset quality stability.

Indian banks are approaching a cyclical turning point, according to a Goldman Sachs research note published on August 22, 2026. The firm projects that core pre-provision operating profit (PPoP) growth will accelerate to approximately 17% year-on-year over FY26-FY29E, a sharp reversal from the moderate earnings environment that has prevailed across the sector for the past several years. The forecast is built on three pillars: steady system loan growth of around 14%, a 10-basis-point recovery in net interest margins off an FY27 trough, and broadly benign asset quality. Even with near-term macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainty, Goldman Sachs argues that the sector has passed the worst of its earnings downgrade cycle.

“

After three fiscal years of earnings downgrades that compressed private-bank core PPoP growth to 9% and state-owned bank growth to 5%, Goldman Sachs now sees a 17% rebound through FY29E.

The significance of the 17% projection is best understood against the backdrop of the last three fiscal years. Between FY24 and FY26, core PPoP compounded at only 9% per year for private banks and 5% for state-owned enterprise banks. Those sub-trend results reflected a challenging macro environment that slowed balance-sheet growth, asset-quality stress in the unsecured lending segment for private banks, and a structural tightening of the operating environment. Goldman Sachs explicitly identifies intense deposit competition, slowing growth in low-cost current and savings account deposits, compressing risk spreads, and broader operational friction as the key headwinds. The fact that these pressures are now, in the firm's view, largely embedded in market multiples is central to the call.

Valuation is the second leg of the thesis. Private bank valuations have dropped near 15-year lows and now sit below levels observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Relative to regional Asian peers, Indian private banks screen as attractive on Goldman Sachs' assessment. The firm also runs a proprietary India Banks Leading Indicator, which it says points to gradual improvement underpinned by healthy GDP growth, improved liquidity from Reserve Bank of India measures, and easier funding conditions. That combination of depressed valuations, a stabilizing macro backdrop, and an inflection in the proprietary indicator forms the basis for expecting an earnings and valuation recovery.

For market participants, the immediate implication is that Indian bank stocks may be positioned for a re-rating if the operating recovery gains traction. The projected 17% core PPoP growth is not uniform across the sector; private banks have historically demonstrated higher growth potential than state-owned banks, and the recovery in net interest margins of 10 basis points from the FY27 trough is modest rather than dramatic. Loan growth of 14% suggests that volume expansion remains healthy, but it also implies that competition for deposits and the cost of funds will remain a swing factor. If deposit competition persists, the margin recovery may be deferred, and the 17% projection could prove optimistic. Conversely, if RBI liquidity measures and GDP growth translate into lower funding costs, the sector could exceed expectations.

Another important consideration is asset quality. The report describes the outlook as benign in aggregate, but the private-bank unsecured lending segment remains a known pressure point. Investors should monitor credit costs in credit cards, personal loans, and microfinance-linked exposures, because a deterioration in those books would quickly feed into PPoP and provision numbers. The use of benign asset quality signals limited expected systemic stress, but it is not a guarantee. The geopolitical and macroeconomic uncertainties referenced in the report also create a wide cone of outcomes, particularly around export-oriented corporate credit and any spillover effects on household balance sheets.

From a policy and macro standpoint, the Reserve Bank of India's liquidity measures are a critical transmission channel. Improved system liquidity lowers short-term funding costs, supports deposit growth, and can relieve the deposit competition that has compressed margins. If the RBI continues to provide durable liquidity, the timeline for the margin trough and subsequent recovery becomes more credible. Conversely, any withdrawal of liquidity or an inflation-driven pause in accommodative conditions would delay the cyclical turn. The report's reliance on the central bank's stance means that its PPoP projection is as much a macro call as a bottom-up banking call.