European AI diversification drives 150% gains in power stocks as tech weighting lags at 9%
Key Takeaways
- As US big tech wobbles, European investors seeking AI exposure are rotating into power suppliers and banks, capitalizing on massive EU and German fiscal packages.
- Prysmian surged 150% and ABB 84% on infrastructure demand, while the Stoxx 600’s minuscule 9% tech weighting forces creative ‘pick and shovel’ trades.
Mentioned
Key Intelligence
Key Facts
- 1The Stoxx 600’s technology sector weight is just 9%, versus 44% for the S&P 500, forcing European AI investors to look beyond traditional tech.
- 2EU grants for decarbonisation and power supply exceed €800 billion, with an additional €500 billion German fiscal package fueling infrastructure stocks.
- 3Italy’s Prysmian surged approximately 150% in the past year, making it one of Europe’s top AI-adjacent performers.
- 4ABB, a Swiss electrification firm supplying Microsoft data centers and collaborating with Nvidia on 800-volt DC, gained 84% over the past year.
- 5Schneider Electric rose 28% and Siemens Energy jumped about 66%, both benefiting from AI-driven power demand.
- 6Eleva Capital’s Stephane Deo described the opportunity as ‘the classic pick and shovel trade’ linked to hyperscaler capex.
I’m taking the view that hyperscalers’ capital expenditure is someone else’s sales...the opportunity is in the classic pick and shovel trade
Unprecedented fiscal support for power infrastructure, creating tailwinds for AI enabler stocks
Analysis
For capital allocators, Europe’s AI opportunity lies not in owning a handful of overcrowded tech names but in the electrification and infrastructure companies that hyperscalers rely on. With over €1.3 trillion in combined EU and German grants, this is a multi-year capex cycle play that offers lower entry multiples and a defensive growth profile—an increasingly rare combination in today’s AI-inflated market.
What to Watch
Europe’s hunt for artificial intelligence stocks is driving investors into unconventional territory, as the continent’s underweight technology sector forces a creative rotation into power suppliers, banks, and infrastructure plays. With the Stoxx 600’s tech weighting at a mere 9% versus the S&P 500’s 44%, and semiconductors specifically at 6% against 19% in the US, pure-play AI names are scarce and crowded. As valuations for the handful of European tech champions rise, fund managers are turning to what Eleva Capital’s Stephane Deo calls ‘the classic pick and shovel trade’—companies whose sales feed off hyperscaler capital expenditure. This strategy paid off handsomely in a week when skepticism over sky-high AI valuations rattled US mega-cap tech stocks. The electrification and power supply theme has become the go-to trade, underpinned by over €800 billion in EU grants for decarbonisation and power supply improvements, plus a separate €500 billion German fiscal package. These tailwinds have propelled French giant Schneider Electric up 28% over the past year, while Italy’s Prysmian has surged about 150%, Siemens Energy has jumped roughly 66%, and Swiss-based ABB, which supplies power distribution to Microsoft data centers and is collaborating with Nvidia on next-generation 800-volt direct current technology, has risen 84%. Beyond power, banks are emerging as another AI beneficiary, as heavy users of the technology in risk management, trading, and customer service, though specific performance metrics for lenders were not detailed in the reports. The trend illustrates a structural reality: Europe’s equity market, dominated by industrials, materials, and financials, is being re-rated as investors connect the dots between AI demand and the physical infrastructure required to support it. Hyperscalers’ projected data center buildouts—estimated to exceed $200 billion through 2027—are translating directly into order books for European engineering and electrical firms. This ‘someone else’s sales’ logic provides a defensive yet growth-oriented angle, as the capex cycle has multi-year visibility and is bolstered by government climate spending. The valuation argument is also compelling: while US AI chipmakers trade at premiums, European infrastructure firms often have diversified revenue streams and attractively lower multiples. However, risks include regulatory hurdles, potential fiscal consolidation, and the global trade tensions that could disrupt supply chains. The breadth of the theme is expanding, with investors now screening for companies that enable electrification of data centers, grid modernization, and even cooling technologies. As AI adoption accelerates across industries, the knock-on effects for Europe’s industrial base are profound, and the market is only beginning to price in the full scope of this transformation. Going forward, the interplay between US tech earnings and European industrial orders will be a key metric to watch, as any slowdown in hyperscaler spending could quickly reverse these gains. For now, the ‘pick and shovel’ playbook, reminiscent of the gold rush, has given European equities a powerful AI narrative of their own—one that does not rely on a handful of overbought semiconductor names.
Sources
Sources
Based on 2 source articles- The Business TimesEurope’s hunt for AI stocks leads to power suppliers and banksJun 28, 2026
- BloombergEurope’s Hunt for AI Stocks Leads to Power Suppliers and BanksJun 28, 2026
How we covered this story
Every story in our finance coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.
Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the finance space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.
| Signal on this page | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| Verified by N sources | Independent corroboration count. N≥2 is our confidence floor; N=1 is marked explicitly. |
| Impact score (1-10) | Regulatory + financial + operational weight. 8+ signals an experienced-operator action item. |
| Sentiment | Five-tier classification trained on labeled finance-specific corpora. |
| Timeline | Where applicable, the related-events sequence that contextualizes today's development. |