Banks Test Quantum-Safe Digital Asset Wallets with ML-DSA-65

For banks and asset managers, the quantum threat is not a science project — it's a balance-sheet risk to digital asset custody and cross-border settlement. A multi-jurisdiction pilot that puts regulators in the same testing environment as financial institutions signals that post-quantum cryptography is moving into operational due diligence, not just standards documents. The promise of open-source, quantum-resilient wallet infrastructure could lower the cost of compliance for institutions that can't build it themselves.

On August 24, 2026, the Responsible Fintech Institute (RFI) and Safeheron announced via PRNewswire the launch of a cross-regional pilot to evaluate post-quantum cryptography for digital asset transactions. The announcement states that selected financial institutions and regulatory stakeholders across multiple jurisdictions are participating, with the stated aim of moving quantum-safe financial infrastructure “from concept into practical testing.” Because this information traces solely to a press release, the participating institutions, funding, and operational milestones remain unverified; the announcement should be read as the organizers’ claim rather than independently reported fact.

“

On August 24, 2026, the Responsible Fintech Institute (RFI) and Safeheron announced via PRNewswire the launch of a cross-regional pilot to evaluate post-quantum cryptography for digital asset transactions.

The technical core of the pilot is a post-quantum cryptography research program built around a multi-party computation protocol that supports ML-DSA-65, the NIST FIPS 204 digital signature standard. ML-DSA-65 is a lattice-based digital signature algorithm formally standardized by NIST in August 2024 as part of the first post-quantum cryptographic standards; it is designed to resist attacks from cryptographically relevant quantum computers. The pilot will test wallet generation and on-chain transfer activity on a quantum-resistant NEAR testnet. Pairing ML-DSA-65 with MPC is notable because MPC splits private-key operations across multiple parties, reducing the risk of a single compromised node exposing signing material—an architectural approach that aligns with the custody needs of regulated financial institutions.

The consortium says it brings together banks and regulators from multiple jurisdictions to examine cross-border interoperability, operational resilience, and governance in parallel with technical evaluation. No specific bank, regulator, or jurisdiction is named in the release, which limits independent assessment of the pilot’s scale, but the framing emphasizes a shared compliance and security reference. Chia Hock Lai, Chairman of the Responsible Fintech Institute, is quoted as saying, “No single bank, vendor, or regulator solves this alone,” and argues that testing the same post-quantum architecture across policymakers and financial institutions builds “a compliance and security reference the whole industry can stand on.” Jag Foo, Chief Security & Policy Officer at Safeheron, links the urgency to AI, saying AI is accelerating the pace of change and “likely bringing the quantum threat closer to reality.”

In industry context, the pilot sits at the intersection of two pressures. First, cryptographically relevant quantum computers could break widely used public-key algorithms such as RSA and ECC, threatening digital signatures and key exchange across financial services. Second, digital asset custody is particularly exposed because wallet keys are long-lived and often stored in ways that are vulnerable to “harvest now, decrypt later” attacks, where encrypted or signed data is collected today for decryption once quantum capability matures. Regulators in major financial centers have begun publishing timelines for post-quantum migration, but concrete implementation guidance for digital assets remains sparse, making cross-border pilots valuable as testbeds.