Last mentioned: Mar 16, 2026
Court Dismissal
Federal Court dismisses ASIC's case against the directors, citing insufficient evidence of personal breach.
ASIC Warning
ASIC Chair Joe Longo issues a statement placing all corporate boards 'on notice' regarding diligence standards.
Federal Court Ruling
Justice Michael Lee finds Matthias Bekier and Paula Martin breached their corporate duties.
License Suspension
Star's casino licenses remain suspended or under management as remediation continues.
ASIC Proceedings Launched
ASIC initiates civil penalty proceedings against 11 directors for breach of duty.
Bell Inquiry Report
Star Entertainment found unfit to hold a casino license in NSW due to systemic failures.
ASIC Lawsuit
The regulator initiates legal action against 11 former Star executives and directors.
NAB/UnionPay Deception
Star falsely claims China UnionPay cards are used for non-gambling purposes to maintain banking access.
Suncity Misconduct
Suspicious cash deliveries and CCTV evasion by junket staff occur at Star casinos.
A new ASIC study reveals that 63% of Gen Z Australians rely on social media for financial advice, raising regulatory concerns about the accuracy of 'finfluencer' content and AI-driven recommendations. Simultaneously, social media algorithms are disrupting traditional real estate and commercial sectors, shifting market dynamics toward decentralized engagement.
The Federal Court has dismissed ASIC’s civil penalty proceedings against former directors of Star Entertainment Group, marking a significant legal setback for the regulator. However, ASIC maintains the case has clarified the high standards of diligence expected of corporate boards, effectively placing directors across Australia on notice.
The Federal Court of Australia has ruled that former Star Entertainment CEO Matthias Bekier and General Counsel Paula Martin breached their corporate duties by overseeing a 'dysfunctional' culture. The ruling centers on the failure to disclose criminal risks associated with the Suncity junket and misleading National Australia Bank regarding prohibited gambling transactions.
This page surfaces every story mentioning ASIC across our finance coverage. We track each entity's appearance over time so readers can trace how the narrative evolves — which developments are isolated incidents, which build into longer arcs, and which reframe how operators in the space think about the entity. Story selection uses the same multi-source verification gate applied across the rest of our coverage.
Read our editorial methodology for how we identify, deduplicate, and score entity references. Our glossary defines the technical terms used across stories on this page, and our trends index contextualizes individual developments against the longer-running finance beat. Cross-entity comparisons live on our compare view.
| What you see | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| Story count | Number of distinct stories where ASIC was a primary or referenced actor. |
| Recency clustering | Whether mentions are concentrated in a recent window (a news cycle) or distributed (a sustained arc). |
| Sentiment distribution | Aggregate sentiment of the stories mentioning this entity, weighted by impact score. |
| Cross-niche links | When the same entity surfaces in our sibling networks, we link to those views to enrich context. |