Last mentioned: 13h ago
Refund Implementation
The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) is expected to establish refund procedures with CBP.
Tariffs Imposed
President imposes reciprocal and drug-trafficking tariffs citing IEEPA authority.
Appellate Deadline
Expected deadline for the U.S. government to file a formal appeal and request a stay.
Judicial Ruling
The Court of International Trade strikes down the tariff expansion as 'arbitrary and capricious.'
Refund Risk Warning
Analysts warn that administrative deadlines are expiring for distributors and retailers.
SCOTUS Ruling
Supreme Court strikes down the tariffs as unconstitutional in a 6-3 decision.
Legal Challenge
Importers challenge the constitutionality of using IEEPA for taxation at the CIT and Supreme Court.
Mass Litigation
Major retail and tech trade groups file a consolidated lawsuit challenging the legality of the duties.
Tariff Re-implementation
The administration announces a new round of 10% baseline tariffs on all Chinese imports.
CIT Remand Results
The court requires USTR to provide further justification for the tariff expansions.
Mass Litigation Begins
Thousands of companies file suits at the CIT challenging the USTR's authority.
List 3 Tariffs Imposed
Trump administration implements 10% duties on $200B of Chinese goods, later raised to 25%.
A landmark judicial decision has struck down key components of the Trump administration's tariff regime against China, challenging the executive branch's authority to levy broad duties. The ruling forces a massive recalibration of global supply chain strategies as businesses face a vacuum of trade policy clarity.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled 6-3 that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs, declaring 2025's sweeping trade levies unconstitutional. This decision creates a potential $175 billion liability for the federal government and leaves importers scrambling for a refund mechanism.
A critical administrative deadline is threatening to deprive U.S. distributors and retailers of billions in potential refunds from Trump-era Section 301 tariffs. Legal experts warn that firms failing to meet strict 'protest' requirements and documentation standards will be barred from retroactive relief as court cases reach a final resolution.